Logo

How low can the Mets go?

Exactly this low. They can’t get fewer than zero hits in a game.

[mlbvideo id=”153416983″ width=”612″ height=”360″ /]

Getting no-hit Tuesday night by the Giants’ Chris Heston — did they think getting hit by pitches counted? — prompted some “sky is falling” moans in Queens.

But here are five reasons not to despair over the Mets’ new infamous entry into the record books:

1. It only happens once every two decades.

Though it seems like something that might happen to the Mets on a regular basis, they hadn’t been no-hit since Sept. 1993 (RIP Darryl Kile) — which was good for the fourth-longest holdout in the majors behind the Cubs (1965), A’s (1991) and Red Sox (April 1993).

Darryl Kile after no-hitting the Mets in 1993.APDarryl Kile after no-hitting the Mets in 1993.AP

2. They’re still in first place!

The Nationals amassed six hits against a guy with half an elbow ligament in a 6-1 loss to the Yankees that kept them buried in second.

Nationals star Bryce HarperUPINationals star Bryce HarperUPI

3. Chris Heston may never be heard from again.

Some other “notables” from the list of no-hitters pitched by a rookie: Bud Smith, Jose Jimenez, Mike Warren, Bo Belinsky. And some old fogey named Christy Mathewson — how did he turn out, anyway?

That’s Albert Pujols on the right, and what’s his name on the left? Oh yeah, Bud Smith.APThat’s Albert Pujols on the right, and what’s his name on the left? Oh yeah, Bud Smith.AP

4. At least a $138 million ace pitcher’s career wasn’t irrevocably damaged this time.

Johan Santana reacts after he finishes the first no-hitter in Mets history.Bill KostrounJohan Santana reacts after he finishes the first no-hitter in Mets history.Bill Kostroun

5. Those three backwards Ks in the ninth inning? Hey, it could have been worse:

Comments
anonymous profile image
Powered by RoundtableBuilt on infrastructure designed for real-time media. Learn more at RTB.io.© Roundtable 2026. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy