Logo

Remember that time before the 2020 election when everyone was focused on social media election interference?

Including the fact that the New York Post had our accounts locked and our stories suppressed.

One of the results of all that was Elon Musk buying Twitter in an effort to rebalance the social media landscape.

Because everyone knew that Twitter, like that dumpster fire called Wikipedia, was insanely politically partisan.

But there is just as much election interference going on now.

And it is time the Republican Party got on top of it.

Not least if it wants to have a fair run in the midterms.

Because as anyone who uses social media will know, there is still a lot of funny business going on.

Where there was once flagrant distortion of the news, a number of the Big Tech companies are now doing things in a far more subtle and insidious way.

Take Apple.

For months I’ve been wondering why Apple keeps pushing me stories I have absolutely no desire to read.

Why does it keep offering me stories from the Guardian, BBC and other left-wing news sites?


  Why does Apple keep pushing stories from left-leaning news sites? AP Why does Apple keep pushing stories from left-leaning news sites? AP

Why is Apple so intent on pushing me stories from the Huffington Post?

A left-leaning blog no one has read, or heard from, in years.

Come to think of it, why does Apple keep pushing a lifestyle magazine for the over-50s on me?

The gall.

I don’t mind reading a variety of news.

In fact, it’s part of my job to do so.

But why is the pushing all going in one political direction?

The New York Post this week revealed one of the reasons.

Apple has set up a sneaky little system of its own, to make sure that its customers get indoctrinated in one political direction.

A study showed that out of 166 articles pushed by Apple News over a two-week period, exactly half came from left-leaning outlets.

Most of the rest came from “centrist” news sources.

Not one of the stories in the carefully curated “top news” stories section came from an outlet that would be classified as “right-leaning.”

In January, Apple’s top stories consisted of 620 stories from left-leaning and other news sources.

Exactly zero stories came from any outlet that could be described as right-leaning.

Among other tricks, Apple tries to justify this by rating news sources on their “trustworthiness.”

And who could have guessed that conservative or other right-leaning outlets are consistently graded as “untrustworthy”?

While almost any left-wing news site will be graded as the most trustworthy news sources of all time.


  Apple never seems to offer any stories from right-leaning news sites. Anadolu via Getty Images Apple never seems to offer any stories from right-leaning news sites. Anadolu via Getty Images

What a funny coincidence.

The thing is that all this has a massive impact not just on the news that people absorb, but on the political priorities of the public.

Consider the way in which the story of the Minnesota Somali fraud scandal turned around.

For a few days, everyone was focused on it.

Gov. Tim Walz and others seemed to be under some genuine political pressure for allowing fraud on a gargantuan scale to take place in that state.

Then suddenly the story was all about ICE.

And every news story being pushed our way seemed to be about how horrible ICE is and how noble the people are who had come out on the streets to shout abuse at its agents.

Was that a coincidence?

Was it organic?

It didn’t feel like it.

It felt entirely manipulated.

And indeed it was.

Because big tech companies can — if they want — completely change the narrative.

Without the American public even knowing that we are being manipulated.

Occasionally when a company like Apple is shamed for this, it will try a quick correction.

Last week Apple chose to push one story from Fox News.

About the tragic death of “Dawson’s Creek” actor James van der Beek.

But that is hardly a story that is going to have any political slant to it.

And so all that Apple was really doing was throwing in one story from a right-leaning source in order to make its bias look slightly less obscene.

But as America gears up for the midterm elections, lawmakers should take a closer look at what is really going on here.

Because social media bosses, like our lawmakers, are very good about bemoaning our “divided” and “fractured” society.

They are far less good at identifying why this fracturing is happening.

One of the key reasons is that social media have caused a shift in news in recent years.

Where once we had different opinions on things, now we have different facts.

The social media companies are trying to push one set of “facts” onto the American people.

But they are “facts” that demonstrably all go in one political direction.

As voters go to the polls in November, which set of “facts” will be pushed our way by the tech giants?

The midterms are likely to be decided by voters’ attitudes toward the economy and the cost of living.

If voters feel that they are better off than they were two years earlier, then the Republicans will benefit at the polls.

If people feel poorer, then the Democrats will have a good run.

But a lot of the truth about consumer confidence, people’s spending and more comes down to attitude: whether we think things are getting better.

And a lot of that comes down to whether people are being told that the economy is going well or not.

It is very easy indeed to manipulate economic data.

Even easier than it is to manipulate a social media algorithm.

If the social media giants continue to line up against any “right-wing” or “conservative” news source, much of the voting public will be getting less than half the actual story.

Perhaps it is time for a committee — led by the vice president or someone else in the administration — to look into all this.

They could start by hauling the tech giants in front of them and asking them what the hell is going on.

Because the administration — and more importantly, the American public — deserve to know.

Comments
anonymous profile image
Powered by RoundtableBuilt on infrastructure designed for real-time media. Learn more at RTB.io.© Roundtable 2026. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy