Logo

The controversial billionaire tax measure has secured enough signatures to appear on the November ballot, according to the union leading the charge.

“Supporters of the Healthcare Executive Compensation Act submitted more than one million signatures to the California Attorney General and county registrars across the state, a landmark step toward qualifying the measure for the November 2026 ballot,” the group said in a statement Sunday.

The tax — proposed by the Service Employees International Union–United Healthcare Workers West — would impose a one-time 5% levy on California residents with assets exceeding $1 billion.


  The controversial billionaire tax measure is now headed for voters to decide on the November ballot. AFP via Getty Images The controversial billionaire tax measure is now headed for voters to decide on the November ballot. AFP via Getty Images

The measure is opposed by many, including top Democrats like the state’s own governor Gavin Newsom, who has warned it could trigger an exodus of wealthy individuals and businesses.

“This will be defeated — there’s no question in my mind,” Newsom said earlier this year. “I’ll do what I have to do to protect the state.”

Republican Vince Fong said the progress of the measure whould be a “wake-up call for every Californian.”

“A wealth tax won’t fix California’s problems, it will make them worse. Pushing out the very taxpayers and job creators California depends on only deepens budget instability and threatens long-term growth,” he told the Post. “California shouldn’t be chasing success away. We need policies that expand opportunity, grow our economy, and restore fiscal stability.”

Fong, who represents the 20th congressional district, insisted the policy has failed everywhere its been tried.

No U.S. state has enacted and implemented a direct “wealth tax” on the total net worth of billionaires, though several states — including New York and Massachusetts — have high-earner “millionaire taxes” on income. A ballot measure is currently being advanced to introduce a state-level wealth tax proposal.

“The SEIU’s proposed wealth tax is the wrong idea at the worst possible time,” Fong said. “It drives people, investment, and jobs out of state, leaving behind deeper deficits and a weaker economy.”

Silicon Valley figures have also pushed back, including Sergey Brin and Ron Conway, who have helped fund efforts to block the proposal and support competing ballot measures aimed at weakening it.

Several billionaires have already left California ahead of the proposal, including Larry Page, Brin, Peter Thiel, Don Hankey, Travis Kalanick and Steven Spielberg.

While the measure has qualified for the ballot, it still needs voter approval — a potential challenge as polling shows mixed views.

About half of voters support it, while 28% oppose it and 23% remain undecided. At the same time, many expressed concern about businesses leaving the state, billionaires relocating, and possible future tax increases.

But it could also result in a loss of state tax revenue up to $4.5 billion annually, according to a new report by the California Tax Foundation.

National figures like Bernie Sanders have rallied support in California, arguing that billionaires have an “addiction” to wealth. The independent senator from Vermont was in Los Angeles in February pushing for the wealth tax.


  Gavin Newsom has warned it could trigger an exodus of wealthy individuals and businesses from California. AP Gavin Newsom has warned it could trigger an exodus of wealthy individuals and businesses from California. AP

  Silicon Valley figures such as Sergey Brin have pushed back against the measure. Chelsea Lauren/Shutterstock Silicon Valley figures such as Sergey Brin have pushed back against the measure. Chelsea Lauren/Shutterstock

Supporters, including SEIU-UHW, say the tax is needed to address healthcare funding gaps tied to cuts to Medicaid and other federal programs implemented last year.

“Every signature represents a patient, a family member, a healthcare worker who is fed up,” said Zelda Aaron, a social worker at Community Hospital of San Bernardino.

“People understand that healthcare costs keep rising while executives take home millions. This measure will finally redirect those dollars where they belong – into patient care and the caregivers who deliver it.”

If approved, the measure is expected to trigger a costly political fight, with opponents backing rival initiatives to weaken it — including proposals to ban taxes on personal assets, redirect revenue to schools, and impose strict oversight rules that could invite legal challenges.

“It’s gambling a potential one-time revenue bump in exchange for massive ongoing losses, which would force cuts to schools and health care,” said Dan Newman, a spokesman for an opposition group backed in part by Conway.

Under California law, if competing measures pass, the one with the most “yes” votes prevails, a dynamic that could also confuse voters.

Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters

California Post News: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, YouTube, WhatsApp, LinkedIn
California Post SportsFacebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X
California Post Opinion
California Post Newsletters: Sign up here!
California Post App: Download here!
Home delivery: Sign up here!
Page Six Hollywood: Sign up here!


Comments
anonymous profile image
Powered by RoundtableBuilt on infrastructure designed for real-time media. Learn more at RTB.io.© Roundtable 2026. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy