Logo

The House Budget Committee met virtually Saturday for a series of procedural votes needed to move President Biden’s sweeping $3.5 trillion social-spending bill ahead for a full vote on the House floor.

A single Democrat, Rep. Scott Peters of California, split with his party and joined Republican members to vote against advancing the bill, which was approved on a 20-17 vote.

“Are you guys out of your flippin’ minds?” Missouri Republican Rep. Jason Smith asked after he tried to delay the committee’s votes on what he called a “Frankenstein bill” that includes massive “handouts to the wealthy” and huge tax increases.

Democrats argued that the spending spree, known as the Build Back Better Act, is a necessity in the wake of coronavirus.

“We will not go back to pre-pandemic normal,” said Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY). “It is essential to the American people, and therefore it is essential that we get it done.”


  Rep. Jason Smith referred to the social spending bill as a “Frankenstein bill.” Photo by Caroline Brehman/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Rep. Jason Smith referred to the social spending bill as a “Frankenstein bill.” Photo by Caroline Brehman/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

The committee, made up of 21 Democrats and 16 Republicans, is not permitted to alter or amend the individual components of the 2,465-page spending bill — which will authorize huge new outlays in education, health care, social safety net programs, and components of the Green New Deal.

Democrats have been scrambling to pass the bill — the central element of President Biden’s legislative agenda — in recent days. While party moderates have increasingly expressed reservations over its broad scope and staggering size, progressives have threatened to hold hostage a separate bipartisan $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill if the larger bill is delayed.


  Rep. Hakeem Jeffries spoke out in favor of the Build Back Better Act. Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images Rep. Hakeem Jeffries spoke out in favor of the Build Back Better Act. Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

“This bill was thrown before this committee in the past 48 hours to meet an arbitrary, artificial and purely political deadline … because the majority needs to reconcile infighting within their own party,” Smith complained.

Comments
anonymous profile image
Powered by RoundtableBuilt on infrastructure designed for real-time media. Learn more at RTB.io.© Roundtable 2026. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy