The announcement of an “impeachment inquiry” in the House to determine whether there are grounds to remove President Biden is more of a political move than a legal one.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s announcement Tuesday doesn’t change what GOP investigators — led by Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) and Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) — are already doing.
It’s unclear whether McCarthy (R-Calif.) will call for a House vote officially declaring an “impeachment inquiry.”
Until then, he’s simply renaming the work Comer and Jordan already are doing.
McCarthy might want to try for a House vote to give the inquiry extra legitimacy — and a few investigative advantages.
In an impeachment inquiry, the House legitimately functions like a grand jury conducting a criminal investigation — in this instance, probing bribery as well as “high crimes and misdemeanors” (which don’t have to be penal offenses but usually are).
Here’s what the Biden family business scandal impeachment inquiry would look like
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy launched an impeachment inquiry Tuesday into President Biden — turbocharging congressional power to acquire documents and testimony about Biden’s role in his family’s foreign business dealings while he was vice president.
House Republicans already have issued an array of demands to executive branch agencies relating to Joe Biden’s involvement with first son Hunter Biden and first brother James Biden’s international dealings — in many cases setting September deadlines that could soon escalate into litigation.
The inquiry aims to answer a number of questions:
What’s in Joe Biden’s vice presidential emails?
While vice president, Joe Biden used the pseudonyms “Robert L. Peters” and “Robin Ware” to communicate with staff members — leaving a paper trail of nearly 5,400 written records.
The House Oversight Committee demanded those communications from the National Archives with an Aug. 31 deadline, but a source tells The Post the agency did not comply.
What do Hunter Biden’s bank records show?
Congressional Republicans are preparing to issue subpoenas to banks for accounts held by Hunter and James Biden — after previously subpoenaing some of the associates’ bank statements.
The records could show whether any money was transferred to Joe Biden from his relatives’ foreign income streams and also whether they covered a substantial portion of his expenses. It’s possible the House will later seek the president’s bank records too.
As a practical matter, though, congressional committees frequently act as if they were grand juries — see, for example, the House January 6 committee, which was unabashed about trying to prove crimes by Trump and made a ballyhooed criminal referral to the Justice Department toward that end.
The real advantage of an impeachment inquiry is political: In the court of public opinion, it is more egregious for the executive branch to defy the information demands of an impeachment committee than those of an ordinary committee.
Moreover, obstructing an impeachment investigation can itself be an impeachable offense.
That’s not much of an advantage, though.
Obstructing any congressional investigation is already a crime — indeed, former Trump advisers Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro have been convicted of criminal contempt for ignoring subpoenas from the House January 6 committee.
And let’s face it: Call it an “impeachment” committee, call it an “oversight committee,” call it “Matilda” if you like; whatever it’s called, the Biden administration is going to stonewall, congressional Democrats are going to say it’s a witch hunt by MAGA Republicans to distract from Trump’s criminal indictments, and the media-Democrat complex is going to circle the wagons around our senescent president.
My advice (which is worth what McCarthy is paying for it — nada) is: Don’t push for an impeachment inquiry unless you’re sure you have the votes of the full House.
Comer and the other GOP-led committees are doing a great job.
In just eight months, they have significantly advanced public awareness of Biden’s corruption. Let them continue their work.
It would only undermine them for McCarthy to lose an impeachment inquiry vote — or otherwise have to climb down from seeking one. It would be an unforced error and a coup for the undeserving Biden.
That might be worth the risk if there were some great benefit in an impeachment inquiry or some real chance of Biden’s being convicted and removed. There’s not.
Andrew C. McCarthy is a former federal prosecutor.
