Here's how political experts and strategists graded Ciattarelli and Sherrill
By Ryan KingPolitical experts who watched the debate were divided on how the candidates fared on stage, but all of them told The Post that Mikie Sherrill had much sharper attacks than in the first debate.
"B-" for both candidates, said Dan Cassino, a politics professor and executive director of the Fairleigh Dickinson University Poll.
“This was more acrimonious than we've seen in the past,” Cassino explained. “They both hit their talking points. Did what they set out to do. Nobody landed a real knockout blow or a huge viral moment that's going to define this debate.”
“This was very much a draw.”

“A” for Jack Ciattarelli and “D" for Sherrill, Republican strategist Jeanette Hoffman said.
“She's definitely sharpened her attacks on Jack, because the polls are tightening, right?” Hoffman explained. “I actually thought that was pretty unhinged and unfounded."
“She was clearly more prepared in this debate in terms of some specifics, not a lot. But I feel [in] this debate, she showed a little bit more desperation.”
“A+” for Sherrill and a “C-” for Ciattarelli, Democratic Strategist Laura Matos said.
“He continued to denigrate her record of public service and misrepresent his positions on everything from affordability to abortion to even how long schools were closed in New Jersey due to Covid,” Matos said.














