House Republicans held their first impeachment hearing against Joe Biden on Thursday, Sept. 28. Follow the Post’s live updates for the latest evidence, allegations and more.
Comer is putting a good public face on the hearing, which lasted a shade over six hours.
"I think we had a great hearing today," he says. "We established the basis for an impeachment inquiry. That was the objective. We did that."
"We established the basis for an impeachment inquiry. That was the objective," House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) said following the six-hour hearing. REUTERS
Comer told reporters after the hearing that Americans "want to know what did this family do to get $20 million and what level of involvement did Joe Biden have, and that's why we will continue this impeachment inquiry." REUTERS
Addressing the media, he adds: "You may be selling that there's no evidence, but let me assure you, the American people aren't buying what you're selling. They want to know what did this family do to get $20 million and what level of involvement did Joe Biden have, and that's why we will continue this impeachment inquiry. I thought it was a great hearing today, and now I've got to go to the floor for House votes."
Comer is asked if a partial government shutdown would interrupt the committees' work.
Comer was "not surprised" that he came out of the six-hour impeachment inquiry hearing and heard there were no breakthroughs to avoid a government shutdown. REUTERS
People attending the hearing. AFP via Getty Images
"I don't think so," he says. "I hope not. We've got important work to do.
"Hopefully we won't have a shutdown. I've been in here all day, I haven't heard if any breakthroughs happened today, I assume they didn't."
When told no, Comer adds, "OK, I'm not surprised."
Rep. James Comer has emerged to take questions from reporters.
"My mission is to follow the money," he says. "To answer the questions for the money. And that's what we're doing.
"Now, we've gotten to the point, because of obstruction, we're having to go to impeachment inquiry. And obviously, our witnesses all testified, yes, you have the basis for an impeachment inquiry. So this was not about impeachment, or it'd have been in the next committee room down. It would have been in Judiciary."
House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) dubbed the first Republican hearing on President Biden's alleged public corruption a "Seinfeld impeachment," since it was "about nothing, apparently."
House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin wrapped the first hearing on President Biden's alleged public corruption by calling the inquiry a "Seinfeld impeachment." Alamy Stock Photo
The hearing was meant to focus on the constitutional and legal questions House Republicans are raising about President Biden. Getty Images
"I'm afraid the majority forgot to bring the evidence with them today," he added, while thanking the witnesses for the "honesty and surprising consensus on the questions today."
"It's not so much the complete absence of fact witnesses that troubles us so much today — it's the complete absence of facts."
Rep. Kweisi Mfume's motion to bring Rudy Giuliani before the committee was voted down in a party-line vote, during the first House Oversight Committee impeachment inquiry into President Biden, on Thursday. AP
Witness Jonathan Turley urged lawmakers to "contact everyone involved" with an FBI informant's claim that Joe and Hunter Biden accepted $10 million in bribery payments from Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky.
Ukrainian businessman and founder of the Burisma Holdings company, Mykola Zlochevsky SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
"I think that when someone who's trusted by the FBI suggests that there was actual bribery in following the president, you need to contact everyone involved, including the source for the 1023," Turley said.
"But also, this is secondhand information, so you have to pursue references," he added. "And you do it in good faith."
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released a redacted version of the FD-1023 form that includes the names of Burisma executives such as Zlochevsky and Vadym Pozharskyi and an intermediary named Alexander Ostapenko.
The file shows Zlochevsky alleging to the FBI's confidential human source that the president and his son "coerced" him into paying each $5 million in a bribe — and he used the same designation as Hunter's business associates in calling Biden "the big guy."
"Squad" member Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) berated Republicans during her time, saying their impeachment drive was a means to distract from the impending partial government shutdown.
Tlaib urged witnesses to take notice of the countdown clock next to her, ticking down to 11:59 p.m. Sept. 30.
Tlaib berated Republicans, saying their impeachment drive was a means to distract from the impending partial government shutdown. Reuters
The Michigan congresswoman recounted personal stories of government workers who "live paycheck to paycheck" and would face financial hardship if a funding bill is not agreed to.
"This is not how the United States of America should treat its own employees," she stressed. "The federal government shutdown has real consequences."
Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) is channeling her inner Kevin McCarthy.
The aspiring senator held up a quote by the speaker and quizzed witnesses over whose words they were before revealing the attribution.
Rep. Katie Porter quizzed witnesses during her time. Reuters
She said House Speaker Kevin McCarthy "is set on delivering an impeachment inquiry whether or not there was any evidence." Reuters
“[An impeachment inquiry without a floor vote would], create a process completely devoid of any merit or legitimacy,” the California Republican had said in 2019, railing against then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s decision to barrel ahead with an impeachment inquiry against then-President Donald Trump without a vote.
“Speaker McCarthy wants to keep his job. So he is set on delivering an impeachment inquiry whether or not there was any evidence,” Porter added.
Witness Jonathan Turley notes that he "made the same objection" to both Pelosi and McCarthy launching impeachment inquiries without a House vote.
Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) and Rep Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) held up Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) midway through her line of questioning, citing concerns that she would show X-rated images again.
"Mr. Chairman, our colleague from Georgia has introduced before pornographic exhibits and displayed things that are really not suitable for children who might be watching," Raskin said.
"A bathing suit's not suitable, Mr. Raskin?" Greene responded.
"Mr. Chairman, our colleague from Georgia has introduced before pornographic exhibits and displayed things that are really not suitable for children who might be watching," Ranking Member Jamie Raskin said, holding up Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene midway through her line of questioning. REUTERS
Rep Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) also interjected, saying "You are submitting a naked woman's body and it has not been cleared before this committee." REUTERS
"You should put your glasses on," Greene shot back at AOC. Reuters
"I would like the member to be instructed to not introduce any pornography today," he repeated.
"A bathing suit is not pornography, Mr. Raskin," she replied.
"Well we can't see it from down there," Raskin said.
"And you are submitting a naked woman's body," Ocasio-Cortez said. "And it has not been cleared before this committee."
"You should put your glasses on. Do you wear them or not?" Greene shot back.
"I have contacts in, thank you," Ocasio-Cortez retorted.
Greene showed explicit pictures of Hunter Biden during a past Judiciary Committee hearing, alleging that the first son had violated the federal Mann Act of 1910 during his escapades with prostitutes.
Crockett (D-Texas) referenced former President Donald Trump's federal indictment on charges of illegally hoarding national security information at his Mar-a-Lago resort.
According to the Democrat, the 77-year-old left "our national secrets, looks like in the s----er to me."