Logo

The US Supreme Court has found that a Pennsylvania school violated a student cheerleader’s right to free speech when it punished her for a profanity-filled Snapchat post she made off campus.

Brandi Levy — then a 14-year-old freshman cheerleader — was suspended in 2017 from cheerleading at Mahoney Area High School for a year for posting “f—k school, f—k cheer” on Snapchat because she was mad she didn’t make the varsity squad.

“The school violated [Levy’s] First Amendment rights when it suspended her from the junior varsity cheerleading squad,” the 8-1 decision from Wednesday reads.

Brandi Levy's Snapchat post was used as evidence in the Supreme Court case.
Brandi Levy’s Snapchat post was used as evidence in the Supreme Court case. Brandi Levy/American Civil Liberties Union via AP

The justices found that Levy, now 18, made the post outside of school hours. She also didn’t name the school or target anyone from the school community when she swore, she used her own cellphone and only sent the post to her circle of friends. And the posts didn’t significantly disrupt the cohesion of her team.

“The school itself has an interest in protecting a student’s unpopular expression, especially when the expression takes place off campus, because America’s public schools are the nurseries of democracy,” the ruling said.

For those reasons, the school didn’t have a right to interfere, the decision reads.

Justice Clarence Thomas was the only dissenting vote.

In his opinion, Thomas said there is a 150-year precedent of schools being able to discipline students — “in loco parentis” or as a substitute of a parent — in similar situations to Levy’s.

The other justices used “broad brushstrokes” to define school authority and failed to explain why the historical rule shouldn’t have been applied in this case, Thomas argued.

The school district said in a statement that it was happy that the justices acknowledged that there are instances when schools do have the right to regulate off-campus speech — contrary to a lower court’s reasoning in the case.”

So, although the court upheld the $1 judgment in favor of Ms. Levy, we are very pleased that the court agreed with our arguments about schools’ authority to address off-campus speech under a wide variety of situations,” the statement said.

Levy’s lawyer did not immediately return a request for comment.

Comments
anonymous profile image
Powered by RoundtableBuilt on infrastructure designed for real-time media. Learn more at RTB.io.© Roundtable 2026. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy